
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Many conservatives, including Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, have advocated the federal government pass legislation that permits people to purchase health insurance across state lines. A recent conversation about this issue made me consider another issue related to this: states’ rights.
The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution states that all powers not explicitly given to the federal government belong to the states. Most conservatives agree that health insurance is not one of those powers given to Washington.
In order for a company to sell health insurance in any given state, they must be approved by that state’s regulatory agency. Each state determines their own criteria for qualifying. If insurance company A that sells insurance in New Mexico wants to offer insurance in Vermont, they must meet Vermont’s qualifications.
I fully support the right of the state to enforce its powers. Now, back to the issue of interstate health insurance.
As I pondered this, I thought about what would be needed for the federal government to pass a law allowing people to purchase coverage across state lines. This would require Washington dictate that each state forgo its own regulations and qualification standards, and instead approve any insurance company doing business in any other state. That, or the federal government would create a singular national approval standard, negating the state’s rules.
Put simply, the federal government must override the state’s rights and the state’s power. The Constitution does not give this power to Washington, but reserves it to the states.
As a conservative who advocates states’ rights, and a supporter of the Constitution, I now contemplate whether I support Washington grabbing more power from the states in the name of fairness or the greater good. Should Washington trample state’s rights further? Isn’t a national mandate forcing states to do the bidding of Washington a violation of the Tenth Amendment, even if it is regarding health insurance?
I offer a better, more conservative solution: citizens in each state should demand their legislators pass a law allowing insurance companies that are authorized to do business in other states (such as border states) be automatically authorized. Thus maintaining each state’s sovereignty, power, and upholding the US Constitution.
Feb
11
2010
States’ Rights and Interstate Health Insurance
Print this page
by John L. Rothra
February 11, 2010
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Many conservatives, including Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, have advocated the federal government pass legislation that permits people to purchase health insurance across state lines. A recent conversation about this issue made me consider another issue related to this: states’ rights.
The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution states that all powers not explicitly given to the federal government belong to the states. Most conservatives agree that health insurance is not one of those powers given to Washington.
In order for a company to sell health insurance in any given state, they must be approved by that state’s regulatory agency. Each state determines their own criteria for qualifying. If insurance company A that sells insurance in New Mexico wants to offer insurance in Vermont, they must meet Vermont’s qualifications.
I fully support the right of the state to enforce its powers. Now, back to the issue of interstate health insurance.
As I pondered this, I thought about what would be needed for the federal government to pass a law allowing people to purchase coverage across state lines. This would require Washington dictate that each state forgo its own regulations and qualification standards, and instead approve any insurance company doing business in any other state. That, or the federal government would create a singular national approval standard, negating the state’s rules.
Put simply, the federal government must override the state’s rights and the state’s power. The Constitution does not give this power to Washington, but reserves it to the states.
As a conservative who advocates states’ rights, and a supporter of the Constitution, I now contemplate whether I support Washington grabbing more power from the states in the name of fairness or the greater good. Should Washington trample state’s rights further? Isn’t a national mandate forcing states to do the bidding of Washington a violation of the Tenth Amendment, even if it is regarding health insurance?
I offer a better, more conservative solution: citizens in each state should demand their legislators pass a law allowing insurance companies that are authorized to do business in other states (such as border states) be automatically authorized. Thus maintaining each state’s sovereignty, power, and upholding the US Constitution.
Related Posts:
This post has no tag